Design a site like this with
Get started

Their Need For Symbolism Will Be Their Downfall


Since October 8, 2017, an purportedly anonymous insider (or group of insiders) has/have been sharing information on the Internet under the handle “Q” (or “QAnon”). I am suspicious of anything shared that cannot be verified, but I also do find it helpful to at least know what people are talking about on social media. The information is freely available, in multiple ways: PDF (Part I, Part II, Part III, and Part IV); searchable online database; a continually updated online spreadsheet; and on Twitter under the hashtag “#QAnon.”

Q’s Purpose

Whoever Q is, the storyline put forward is one of President Trump getting justice done. True, the mass of information is both overwhelming in quantity and confusing in quality, since Q often speaks in riddles and code, and offers more questions than answers. That said, about a month ago I put together a presentation to try and help myself understand its meaning and intent. Clearly, the narrative is one of President Trump acting to restore justice and the rule of law both nationally and internationally, against a great many enemies.

Use of Symbols 

As a branding researcher and blogger I took note of this post, dated November 21, 2017, with some curiosity:

“Their need for symbolism will be their downfall….They don’t hide it. They don’t fear you. You are sheep to them. You are feeders.”

Like many people I have read articles claiming that Hollywood and the music industry continually blast us with secret occult brainwashing symbols, but given the outlandish nature of these claims I found the hard to take seriously.

But it is clear, at least over the past year, that high-level Democrats at least are not only displaying some strange symbols but also sharing them in a social setting. For example:
  • John Podesta associate James Alefantis’ once-public Instagram account, and its lurid images of toddlers, children and blood, which contains comments that sound like a disturbing insider language (e.g. “hotard” next to an image of a baby).
  • Code words in the John Podesta emails released by Wikileaks, with the frequent use of words that seem incongruous and that may refer to pedophilia and other sexual activity. Examples: “pizza,” “pasta,” “walnut sauce,” “dominos,” and “pig roast.”
  • The cannibal and pedophilic “art” displayed by John Podesta and his brother Tony. There has been at least one mainstream media report that Tony Podesta’s art made people sick, and that this delighted him.
  • The social connection between Tony Podesta and Marina Abramovic and her practice of “spirit cooking.” Abramovic is a well-known “artist” whose parties have visibly featured cakes shaped like dead bodies with flowing blood.
  • Other unexplained and highly promoted public images, such as the “birthday present” of a “pizza friendship bracelet” from Vice President Joe Biden to then-President Barack Obama. This is not a present I have ever heard of before, particularly from one elderly man to another.

Circumstantial Evidence of Criminal Activity?

These types of symbols bothered me from the day I saw them, partly because they are so gross; partly because these are powerful leaders who have greatly influenced the direction of our Nation; and partly because their open display just did not make sense to me.

If you were a criminal, why would you brag to the world about what you are doing, and open yourself up to arrest?

The issue really came to a head for me in the discussion about supposed photo and/or video evidence of Hillary Clinton engaging in pedophilia. To hear social media sources tell it, this evidence was supposedly collected by Anthony Weiner in a file called “life insurance” and stored on the personal computer he shared with Huma Abedin. For her part, Abedin is widely rumored to be Hillary Clinton’s longtime lover and a participant in these activities.

On Twitter, I asked the question, why would Hillary Clinton voluntarily tape herself doing these things?

To which the response came quickly that I am naive, and I do not understand how the “cabal” of elites works: They delight in taping their exploits; for them it is a kind of trophy.

Q’s Statement In Light Of The Bible

Taping their exploits…trophies…the cabal. It still sounded outrageous to me. But then I thought about Q’s words, “their need for symbolism will be their downfall,” when reflecting on this past week’s Bible reading, which contains the story of Tamar and Judah. 

The story is about the role of symbols in outing a hypocrite, who would otherwise have sentenced an innocent woman to death. If not for the presence of those symbols, there would have been no exonerating proof for her.

Essentially, like all women at that time, Tamar lived a deeply unfair life, a life characterized by sexual slavery. The daughter in law of Judah, she had to support herself through either marriage-as-prostitution or sex outside of wedlock for money. 

Genesis relays the terrible shame she endured as first, she was blamed for the death of Judah’s evil sons; then she has to become a prostitute; and then she is sentenced to death when her pregnancy becomes visible.

The Bible teaches that after Tamar was basically living on the street, Judah requested her “services,” not knowing it was her. She accepts payment in the form of a goat, but in the meantime takes some of his symbols (his seal and its cord, and his staff/walking stick) as proof that she is owed compensation. 

However, things go from bad to worse when Tamar gets pregnant from the union, and her status as a visibly “immoral” woman becomes public. She is brought to Judah and sentenced to death, whereupon she produces the symbols he left with her: He in fact was the “client.”

Confronted with the truth, Judah releases Tamar.

Arrogance, Ego, Justice

At this point the mainstream media has refused to investigate whether Hillary Clinton herself has been involved in pedophilia or child sex trafficking, or whether the same can be said of the circle in which she travels.

They have declined to investigate despite the fact that two women so far (Cathy O’Brien and Sarah Ashcraft) have come forward to name her specifically as a participant in some form of ritual sexual practices involving trafficked girls.

Perhaps the reason for not conducting such an investigation is the lack of credibility of the witnesses. Perhaps.

But if there are photos and/or video recordings of Hillary Clinton and/or her associates committing such crimes — taken for personal pleasure, or to be reviewed and shared later on as a form of celebrating — it seems inevitable that those images will in fact be released to the public, or at least in a court of law.

Even as late as it is, it is still not too late for her and her associates to come forward, and give their side of the story, whatever it is: the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Copyright 2017 by Dr. Dannielle (Dossy) Blumenthal. All opinions are Dr. Blumenthal’s own. This post is hereby released into the public domain.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: